Using Percentages in Pearsons R

Discussion in 'Statistics' started by BooHaHa, Dec 8, 2010.

  1. BooHaHa

    BooHaHa Guest

    Hello all,

    First time here, long time usenet junkie. Have a random question on
    using Pearson's R and not exactly a statistician.

    If I was looking for a relationship between poulation and unemployment
    would you use the unemployment rate or the number of unemployed?
    Certainly the .08 or .09 unemployment number will work in stats
    packages but .08 in Los Angeles is far different than .09 in some small
    So when you take the mean of the population of a long list of cities
    and the mean of percent or number of unemployed and plug these in to
    Person's , using percent seems like it would always have a very low R,
    regardless of +/-.

    Been to a lot of websites and done a lot of reading but needed to ask
    somewhere. :)

    Any feedback would be appreciated.
    BooHaHa, Dec 8, 2010
    1. Advertisements

  2. BooHaHa

    Ray Koopman Guest

    It depends on what you want to talk about -- the unemployment rate,
    or the number of unemployed people. The problem arises only when you
    say just "unemployment", which is ambiguous. (The same sort of thing
    happens in discussions of "crime".)
    Ray Koopman, Dec 8, 2010
    1. Advertisements

  3. BooHaHa

    BooHaHa Guest

    Thanks Ray, have been banging this around for a few days and want to
    make sure I use SPSS the right way, and of course get the right result.
    Pearson's uses averages so how do use an average of percentages that
    were derived from one of the variables to start with.
    Seems like the unemployment rate for example is use to normalize raw
    data between cities so you can compare them. But then in Pearsons one
    variable is population but you would want to use the # of unemployed,
    not the %, as the other variable.
    Doesn't prove anything but the question might be whether their is a
    relationship between population and unemployment.

    Thanks again for the reply.
    BooHaHa, Dec 9, 2010
  4. BooHaHa

    Ray Koopman Guest

    If there is much variability in the sizes of the cities then it's
    a foregone conclusion that the number of unemployed will correlate
    positively with size. However, finding that the unemployment rate
    correlates with size would be informative. Just remember that much
    work has been done on this by many people using techniques that are
    more complicated than simple correlation, so don't take your initial
    results too seriously, one way or the other.
    Ray Koopman, Dec 9, 2010
  5. BooHaHa

    BooHaHa Guest

    was just using this as my example. Really just after that it is better
    to use the raw data for a correlation than a percentage because of the
    "weight" it gives in the Pearson's formula. Could still be + or -, no,
    low or high but will calculate the right way.
    BooHaHa, Dec 9, 2010
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.