Reply to thread

An example of how probabilities are calculated in poker hand.




Probability and Statistics with Applications: A Problem Solving Text By Leonard Asimow, Ph.D., ASA, Mark Maxwell, Ph.D., ASA


You can ask me for more details about question, I won't paste them here, as it'd make the question too lengthy to view.



What problem I'm trying to do?



I am trying to find expected probability for random number independence testing aka poker test.



We've 10,000 random numbers of five digit each. They're assumed to be independent.



My calculations-:



1) Full house


10C1*9C1/10,000


=0.009



I'm correct. My only confusion here would be the denominator. Why is it 10,000?


According to the above example, should not it be 10C5?



Explanation of my thought process-:



First pick 1 digit out of 10 digits. Then next, pick another digit(only 1 digit as we need a pair), out of remaining 9 digits.



2) 1 pair:



Again I looked at that highlighted figure.


For one pair, from 10 digits, choose 1 digit. That 1 digit makes a pair. Now you've remaining 3 choices. But none of those choices can be same to each other. So,



10C1*9C1*8C1*7C1/10,000


=0.504


I'm correct here as well.



3) 3 of a kind:


Here, I need to pick only single digit for 3 places, then 2 different digits for the remaining 2 places.


So,


10C1*9C1*8C1/10,000


=0.072



Here, also I'm correct. But not anymore.



4) Four of a kind:



So from 10 digits, I need to pick 1 digit and out remaining 9 digits, I need to pick another 1 digit.


So, it should be 10C1*9C1/10,000


But it becomes similar to full house. This is wrong. I don't get why this became wrong.



5) 5 different digits:



This should've been simple, I got the answer but I got the answer greater than 1.



10C1*9C1*8C1*7C1*6C1/10,000


=3.024



I'm not sure why I got this. I am skeptical about the denominator since the start as I feel that's randomly chosen here unlike above where we did 52C5. If I increase 1 "zero" in denominator, the answer would be correct. (I've seen techniques like 10/10*9*10*8/10*7/10*6/10, but i prefer to do it as per the first poker example figure I showed so that it becomes simple for understanding).



6) Five of a kind:



It should be 10C1/10,000


=0.001


but it is instead 0.0001, so it's asking for another "zero" in the denominator for correct answer. I don't know why.


We have just 10,000 random numbers.



This is the reason for studying this-:


https://genuinenotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Random-Numbers.pdf


Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
2,530
Messages
9,859
Members
696
Latest member
fairdistribution
Back
Top