It is the inherent nature of all things, that they are a compilation of two different, and distinct things. It is axiomatic that these two things are space, and value. The value of any given thing being what it is, while the space is what it occupies.
It is true that abstract, or otherwise, numbers are a thing. Therefore, they must also contain a compilation of space, and value. It is an axiomatic truth, that space is the labeling of quantities of dimensions. It is an axiomatic truth, that value is the labeling of quantities of existence, other than dimensions.
So then why do absract numbers not also contain a quantity of space?
You may say, that numbers are absract. Therefore they do not have space. Let us consider Unicorns.
Unicorns are absract. Yet I can imagine a fat unicorn, or a tall unicorn. All indicators of space, or dimension.
Name anything absract. It also contains an amount of absract space.
So too then...should numbers...be they absract or otherwise.
It is true that abstract, or otherwise, numbers are a thing. Therefore, they must also contain a compilation of space, and value. It is an axiomatic truth, that space is the labeling of quantities of dimensions. It is an axiomatic truth, that value is the labeling of quantities of existence, other than dimensions.
So then why do absract numbers not also contain a quantity of space?
You may say, that numbers are absract. Therefore they do not have space. Let us consider Unicorns.
Unicorns are absract. Yet I can imagine a fat unicorn, or a tall unicorn. All indicators of space, or dimension.
Name anything absract. It also contains an amount of absract space.
So too then...should numbers...be they absract or otherwise.
